Posts Tagged ‘stakeholder engagement’

Do you dare to make stakeholder engagement a more transparent and productive process?

Tuesday, May 14th, 2013

Stakeholder engagement is as old as business itself. It happens in your company’s countless daily interactions with customers, employees, suppliers, investors, regulators and others. What has changed in the past decade or so is that many companies have begun taking a systematic approach to this engagement as they seek to manage their sustainability risks. They have identified key stakeholder groups and the issues that concern them, and are actively managing dialogue with these groups.

So far, so good. In reality, however, the process is often tightly controlled and the outputs carefully communicated. Many companies invite stakeholders to attend occasional managed events or one-to-one discussions. Typically, these involve a presentation from both sides and a discussion of external expectations and internal constraints (and sometimes opportunities). In essence, this is a defensive tactic. It can backfire when consequent action – or lack of it – ends up eroding rather than building stakeholder relationships.

Thankfully, that is starting to change.

(more…)

Integrate and celebrate?

Saturday, November 27th, 2010

Integrated reporting is coming of age. With the launch of the International Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC), the publication of books such as One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy by Robert Eccles & Michael Krzus and briefings coming out of the big accountancy firms, it seems something fundamental is happening in the world of corporate reporting. However, is it one report that’s needed, and is something worth celebrating really happening?

Well, no – and, maybe, yes.
(more…)

Stakeholder resistance building pipeline pressure

Friday, October 22nd, 2010

With nearly two million miles of built pipelines in the U.S., the normally mundane world of oil and gas pipelines stays out of sight, out of mind and out of the headlines. This year, however, things have been different. 

Already facing criticism over their role in climate change – largely guilt through association with their customers – oil and gas transport companies found their own practices thrust into the spotlight after a series of incidents plaguing the energy sector in 2010 culminated in the recent natural gas explosion in San Bruno, California.  If the link between pipelines and climate change is a difficult concept for stakeholders to grasp, concerns over personal health and safety are not.  Adding to the woes of pipeline companies is a rising level of stakeholder resistance to infrastructure projects in general, ranging from offshore wind farms to high-speed rail. In addition, where once government support for infrastructure projects was practically a given, that support can be more difficult to secure where financial or political costs are perceived to be too high.  

As a result, new pipeline projects face hurdles and a higher level of scrutiny than ever before. Project managers will have to go beyond the call of duty if they are to overcome stakeholder resistance and avoid the risk of costly delays or the potential of derailment. As two of my colleagues wrote earlier this year, stakeholder collaboration can be a key to avoiding these pitfalls and building required support.
(more…)

Strategic sustainability investment in oil, gas and mining: Chevron and Rio Tinto

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

I recently attended the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Corporate Responsibility Forum in Washington, D.C. – an event for CR practitioners in the extractives sector and those of us who provide technical assistance to oil, gas and mining companies on the IFC’s Performance Standards. It was a very thought-provoking event.

Social investments are often a condition of IFC financing or a contractual obligation of host governments. There may be a considerable lag before new extractives projects generate taxes or royalties that governments can spend on social and economic development, especially with green-field projects. Further, today’s oil, gas and mining operations are highly technical and mechanized, creating fewer prospects for employment beyond the construction phase. Together these factors have an enormous influence on stakeholder expectations and extractives companies’ abilities to acquire and retain their ‘social license to operate’.

As poll data has indicated, trust in companies remains at an all-time low thanks to the global financial crisis. Yet stakeholders expect the private sector to find innovative solutions to our critical sustainability challenges. The bar has therefore been raised for companies in demonstrating the value they create through resource extraction.

Two sub-themes of the conference, Beyond Philanthropy: Strategic Community Investment and Measuring the Returns on Sustainability Investment spoke to this reality. There were two presentations I found particularly useful.
(more…)

Stakeholder engagement and the green energy revolution

Monday, January 25th, 2010

We work a great deal with clients in the energy sector. There is obviously a great deal of drive to engage in and discuss alternate energy technologies and infrastructure – wind, solar, biofuels, geothermal, hydrogen, etc. But just because alternate energy gets the green stamp of approval does not mean stakeholders will give carte blanche to new developments. Communities and governmental stakeholders will continue to have concerns that need to be managed and communicated.
(more…)